PERSONAL ETHICAL DILEMMA ASSIGNMENT Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

PERSONAL ETHICAL plight ASSIGNMENT - Essay ExampleSo, if the item was $ 18.00, she would provide the change for a $ 20.00 bill from the cash register, and and so just replace the $ 2.00 from her own money. That is, so the register would add-up properly at the end of the work day. So, she would carrier bag the $ 18.00 and this was unquestionably stealing. My personal values were such that I would non have done what she did. I was in the same position as her, but never took advantage of the advice that she gave me about stealing. However, there was conflict with these feelings because I never told on her or turned her in to management. We were not close friends, or did not interact outside of the workplace, but did get to know each other pretty well. We spent enough period together on the job such that I got to know and like her. Conversely, we both worked for an make-up and a manager which we had little regard for. The wages were low, the working conditions were often strained, and the manager was often verbally offensive and generally unlikable. So, the conflict in question was defined by my ethical belief that stealing was wrong, and yet, I did not act as a whistle blower or act dutifully as an employee and inform the organization that they were being stolen from. Consequentialism looks at the proceedss of behaviors rather than the intentions. Socially, we very often evaluate individual actions on how their intentions were. So, for example, while lying is generally wrong, if your grandmother asks you what you think about her hideous looking dress, and you tell her she looks nice, your intentions be good even though the result is an immoral act. A consquentialist position looks at only the outcome or the consequence of the act. In scathe of my own personal ethical dilemma, the consequence of my co-workers actions were unquestionably immoral. In terms of the other stakeholders, the organization was being stolen from as a consequence. And, knowing that she was doing this makes me complicit to some extent. My obligations in an employee/employer race are directed toward the organization and not the employees. Generally, utilitarianism is associated with consequentialism. It argues that the aim of individuals is joy, and an action or behavior therefore, either maximizes or diminishes the greater goal of happiness. Further, we should maximize the greater happiness for the greatest number of individuals Perry, 1993, p. 531. In this instance, while the employee was maximizing their own happiness, they were doing so at the expense of someone else namely, the employer. However, as a dilemma, it raises the question as to whose happiness I ought to consider? While I had little regard for the organization, I should have turned in the employee on this ethical model because the consequence was that one agents happiness came at the expense of an others. In terms of the greater good for the greater number, there were only 2 goods to conside r the individual stealing and the organization that was incurring the loss. If the business had gone bankrupt because of the theft, obviously a greater number would be effected, however, it was not a substantial amount of money so that it cant be said that a greater than two stakeholders were to be considered. Under a deontological framework, one should not will an act that