Third World Countries Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Third World Countries - Essay ExampleAccordingly, underdevelopment emerges as a consequences of culture, politics, dependency and colonialisation, although not necessarily in that order.Dependency theorists facial gesture towards history for the clarification of the reasons why some countries have successfully attained economical development while others have displayed a persistent failure to do the same and, are immediately influenced by Wallersteins ball brasss theory. The aforementioned may be defined in the following terms (DuPlessis, 1988 222)Wallersteins method, is premised on two coupled propositions first that social change occurs only in social systems and second, that the social system appropriate as an object of analysis is a world system Hence, his concern is with the evolution of structures of the whole system, understood as entirely distinct from its component parts, rather than with the histories - veritable(a) if treated comparatively - of the various regions, n ations or flock that it includes. A world system, is a real, identifiable, analyzable thing bounded and substantially self-contained, it consists of a unified economy founded on a well-developed division of labor to that extent incorporating a multiplicity of cultures.As may be deduced from the above quote, the World Systems Theory (WST) defines the global policy-making economy as a single whole, just comprised of numerous distinct categories. The first category is the core, who benefited the most from the capitalist world economy, because they were the colonial powers and motivated colonialism in order to expand both their economic and political influence over the globe, using their strong military displumes to do so (Modern History Sourcebook, n.d. n.p.). The second category, the Periphery, can be defined as the ill-used and the oppressed compared to the exploiter and oppressor status of the core. As Lachman (1988) argues, the periphery countries did not have the strong and stable political systems which the core did, also lacking the military force which the core had. Consequently, this left them vulnerable to forced political and economic exploitation.Even with the demise of colonialism, the systems theory remains very active for two reasons. The first is that the economic effects of imperialism are long-term. This historical era gave the North or the core, a tremendous head start over the South in terms of development, even culminating in the regression of the economies of the South and limiting their potential for development. As stated in the Modern History Sourcebook, according to Wallersteins systems theory, an analysis of the history of the capitalist world system shows that it has brought about a skewed development in which the economic and social disparities between sections of the world economy have increased rather than provided successfulness for all. The second is that colonialism was ultimately followed by neo-colonialism, whereby the mu ltinational corporate representatives of the core continued the drainage of the souths resources and its transference to the North (Li, 2000). As per the presented argument, representing the stand of the dependency theorists on the enquiry of the Souths continued underdevelopment, underdevelopment is rooted in historical circumstances which effectively ensured the impoverishment of the South and its